-
1981 over 1982
Mexican 20 centavos overdate (class III) with a 1981 hub over a 1982 hub.
Jason Cuvelier
MadDieClashes.com - ErrorVariety.com
TrailDies.com - Error-ref.com - Port.Cuvelier.org
CONECA
(images © Jason Cuvelier 2008-18)___________________
-
Post Thanks / Like - 3 Thanks, 6 Likes
-
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 1 Likes
-
OMG wish those mint workers would move to Philly very nice mistake! Congrats on another cool bay find!
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 1 Likes
-
In 1982 Mexico defaulted on debt, then the currency started to devalue faster, I think later they did something like a reverse split 10-1 or 100-1 devaluation.
I wonder if that was a reason why in 82 they might have been making coins worth less than the effort to make them, I wonder if that explains this mistake.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 1 Likes
-
At least two scenarios I can think of.
1) Take a 1982 die and pull a "Back to the Future " to 1981. Late production of 1981 they ran short of dies to complete their quota? What's a mint official to do to do. Take one already completed for 1982 and hub it with a 1981 date?
2)Or..... in 1982, take a left over die from 1981, and hub (much lighter) with the 1982 working hub. I think this might produce an effect where the 1981 looked stronger on the coins.
However it happened, this is one neat looking coin.
Last edited by Petespockets55; 04-19-2018 at 02:58 AM.
Reason: Spelling
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 1 Likes
-
That is very cool looking!! Maybe the mint worker at the time was just very confused as to what year it was!
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 1 Likes
-
I love that over date. I wonder how many exist if the currency valuation was changed and the old coins were demonetized?
Even a fool can look wise if he keeps his mouth closed.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 1 Likes
-
Wow!! That is awesome! Congrats!
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 1 Likes
-
If they had a bad economic situation I would think they needed to save money at the mint, thus -reuse the dies anyway possible. JMHO.
WS
-
Originally Posted by
WaterSport
If they had a bad economic situation I would think they needed to save money at the mint, thus -reuse the dies anyway possible. JMHO.
WS
I agree but wouldn't you expect it to be 1982/1981 ( most recent year over older year)
not as this one looks, 1981/1982.
Very neat doubling.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 1 Likes
Bookmarks