Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Click the "Create Account" button now to join.
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 24

Thread: 1981 over 1982

  1. #1
    Moderator, Die & Variety Expert jcuve's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    15,457
    Post Thanks / Like
    Rep Power
    3149

    1981 over 1982

    Mexican 20 centavos overdate (class III) with a 1981 hub over a 1982 hub.




    Jason Cuvelier


    MadDieClashes.com - ErrorVariety.com
    TrailDies.com - Error-ref.com - Port.Cuvelier.org
    CONECA

    (images © Jason Cuvelier 2008-18)___________________

  2. #2
    Paid Member Petespockets55's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    East Coast, florida
    Posts
    6,722
    Post Thanks / Like
    Rep Power
    510
    Unbelievably awesome.

  3. Likes jcuve liked this post
  4. #3
    Forum Ambassador VAB2013's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Cullman, AL
    Posts
    12,351
    Post Thanks / Like
    Rep Power
    867
    OMG wish those mint workers would move to Philly very nice mistake! Congrats on another cool bay find!

  5. Likes jcuve liked this post
  6. #4
    Registered User GrumpyEd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    7,229
    Post Thanks / Like
    Rep Power
    1017
    In 1982 Mexico defaulted on debt, then the currency started to devalue faster, I think later they did something like a reverse split 10-1 or 100-1 devaluation.
    I wonder if that was a reason why in 82 they might have been making coins worth less than the effort to make them, I wonder if that explains this mistake.

  7. Likes jcuve liked this post
  8. #5
    Paid Member Petespockets55's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    East Coast, florida
    Posts
    6,722
    Post Thanks / Like
    Rep Power
    510
    At least two scenarios I can think of.

    1) Take a 1982 die and pull a "Back to the Future " to 1981. Late production of 1981 they ran short of dies to complete their quota? What's a mint official to do to do. Take one already completed for 1982 and hub it with a 1981 date?

    2)Or..... in 1982, take a left over die from 1981, and hub (much lighter) with the 1982 working hub. I think this might produce an effect where the 1981 looked stronger on the coins.

    However it happened, this is one neat looking coin.
    Last edited by Petespockets55; 04-19-2018 at 02:58 AM. Reason: Spelling

  9. Likes jcuve liked this post
  10. #6
    Paid Member makecents's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Location
    Roanoke, VA
    Posts
    10,908
    Post Thanks / Like
    Rep Power
    816
    That is very cool looking!! Maybe the mint worker at the time was just very confused as to what year it was!

  11. Likes jcuve liked this post
  12. #7
    Registered User uglycent's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Washington, the state (Kitsap Co.)
    Posts
    1,386
    Post Thanks / Like
    Rep Power
    167
    I love that over date. I wonder how many exist if the currency valuation was changed and the old coins were demonetized?
    Even a fool can look wise if he keeps his mouth closed.

  13. Likes jcuve liked this post
  14. #8
    Paid Member
    Join Date
    May 2016
    Location
    East York, Pennsylvania
    Posts
    2,488
    Post Thanks / Like
    Rep Power
    201
    Wow!! That is awesome! Congrats!

  15. Likes jcuve liked this post
  16. #9
    Paid Member WaterSport's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Mount Pleasant, SC
    Posts
    3,052
    Post Thanks / Like
    Rep Power
    550
    If they had a bad economic situation I would think they needed to save money at the mint, thus -reuse the dies anyway possible. JMHO.

    WS

  17. #10
    Paid Member Petespockets55's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    East Coast, florida
    Posts
    6,722
    Post Thanks / Like
    Rep Power
    510
    Quote Originally Posted by WaterSport View Post
    If they had a bad economic situation I would think they needed to save money at the mint, thus -reuse the dies anyway possible. JMHO.

    WS
    I agree but wouldn't you expect it to be 1982/1981 ( most recent year over older year)
    not as this one looks, 1981/1982.
    Very neat doubling.

  18. Likes jcuve liked this post
 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •