Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Click the "Create Account" button now to join.
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 24
  1. #1
    Paid Member ray_parkhurst's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Santa Clara, Ca
    Posts
    1,846
    Post Thanks / Like
    Rep Power
    449

    A few physical backgrounds to compare

    I like shooting on backgrounds that will stay with the image, ie I do not like cropping a coin out of an image and placing it on an artificial/digital background. Invariably some detail of the edge is lost, or there are remnants of the background showing, etc. For Cents I usually use either a black velvet or a textured plastic. Occasionally an interesting material pops up that I want to try. That happened today as I unpacked a box from REI. There were black plastic sheets used to protect the contents. The sheets have an interesting hexagonal divot pattern which I thought might look good. Anyway, below are pics of a 55-S BIE on several different backgrounds for your viewing pleasure:

    Hex Divot


    Photo Black Velvet


    Plant Tray




    True-Grey


    Soft Foam


    Cotton Pique


    Rough Sticker


    Microscope Stage


    Contact Black
    Last edited by ray_parkhurst; 11-19-2019 at 04:49 PM.
    Builder of Custom Coin Photography Setups. PM me with your needs or visit http://macrocoins.com

  2. #2
    Registered User GrumpyEd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    7,229
    Post Thanks / Like
    Rep Power
    1017
    I like the black velvet the best.

    I'm wondering if the backgrounds change the file size much. It would seem like cropping onto a solid black or any truly solid color would result in a smaller file size especially if there's any compression. Do you see that in the file sizes with different backgrounds vs a solid color?

  3. Thanks scubalou, Petespockets55 thanked for this post
  4. #3
    Paid Member ray_parkhurst's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Santa Clara, Ca
    Posts
    1,846
    Post Thanks / Like
    Rep Power
    449
    The black velvet, which has a completely black background, is the smallest at 517k. The largest is the last one, microscope stage, at 899k. So there is indeed a lot of extra data required to store the more complex backgrounds.

    I forgot to upload one of the backgrounds...here is Contact Black, also added above:

    Builder of Custom Coin Photography Setups. PM me with your needs or visit http://macrocoins.com

  5. Thanks GrumpyEd, scubalou, Petespockets55 thanked for this post
    Likes GrumpyEd, scubalou, Petespockets55 liked this post
  6. #4
    Paid Member eaxtellcoin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Wood River IL
    Posts
    2,085
    Post Thanks / Like
    Rep Power
    370
    I'm the pessimist on this one. Black backgrounds take light away from the edge of all parts of the coin. I.E the rim, back of the head, back of shoulder and in front of the face. The Rev with the flatter field is alot easier. I don't have any problems with white on the REV and usually only slight darker at the back of the head and shoulder. Black makes it all to dark for me.

  7. Thanks scubalou thanked for this post
    Likes makecents, scubalou, Petespockets55 liked this post
  8. #5
    Paid Member ray_parkhurst's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Santa Clara, Ca
    Posts
    1,846
    Post Thanks / Like
    Rep Power
    449
    When I am shooting a coin to sell, I use a textured background. This is why I wanted to try the new backgrounds (hex divot and contact black), ie I wanted to see if they would be better than the plant tray I've generally used. I do like the new ones, but I am still liking the plant tray best.
    Builder of Custom Coin Photography Setups. PM me with your needs or visit http://macrocoins.com

  9. Thanks scubalou, Petespockets55 thanked for this post
    Likes scubalou, Petespockets55 liked this post
  10. #6
    Paid Member eaxtellcoin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Wood River IL
    Posts
    2,085
    Post Thanks / Like
    Rep Power
    370
    Brother, to each is own
    The color is the best take away. I think on my screen the color is best with the second pic.
    Eric

  11. Thanks scubalou thanked for this post
    Likes scubalou, Petespockets55 liked this post
  12. #7
    Paid Member makecents's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Location
    Roanoke, VA
    Posts
    10,919
    Post Thanks / Like
    Rep Power
    816
    Very cool Ray!! I do not have a favorite other than to say I like the textured backgrounds the best. The contrast, in my opinion, make the coin stand out more. I have no pic knowledge at all but have a question for you. The textured, that obviously take more pixels, does this force a sharpened pic of the coin also?

  13. Thanks scubalou, Petespockets55 thanked for this post
    Likes scubalou, Petespockets55 liked this post
  14. #8
    Paid Member ray_parkhurst's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Santa Clara, Ca
    Posts
    1,846
    Post Thanks / Like
    Rep Power
    449
    Quote Originally Posted by eaxtellcoin View Post
    Brother, to each is own
    The color is the best take away. I think on my screen the color is best with the second pic.
    Eric
    So you like the color with black background, but not the lighting.


    Quote Originally Posted by makecents View Post
    Very cool Ray!! I do not have a favorite other than to say I like the textured backgrounds the best. The contrast, in my opinion, make the coin stand out more. I have no pic knowledge at all but have a question for you. The textured, that obviously take more pixels, does this force a sharpened pic of the coin also?
    The coin itself doesn't change a whole lot due to the background. The images are a little different since I processed a couple of them differently to enhance the backgrounds for the comparison, but the background doesn't really affect the coin much.
    Builder of Custom Coin Photography Setups. PM me with your needs or visit http://macrocoins.com

  15. Thanks scubalou, Petespockets55 thanked for this post
    Likes scubalou, Petespockets55 liked this post
  16. #9
    Registered User GrumpyEd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    7,229
    Post Thanks / Like
    Rep Power
    1017
    The black velvet, which has a completely black background, is the smallest at 517k. The largest is the last one, microscope stage, at 899k. So there is indeed a lot of extra data required to store the more complex backgrounds.
    Thanks!
    That is a big difference especially if you store a lot of images it's using 73% more data. Might be even more difference if it's a truly solid color since even the velvet has a texture. I didn't expect it to be quite that different.

  17. Thanks scubalou, Petespockets55 thanked for this post
    Likes scubalou, Petespockets55 liked this post
  18. #10
    Paid Member ray_parkhurst's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Santa Clara, Ca
    Posts
    1,846
    Post Thanks / Like
    Rep Power
    449
    Quote Originally Posted by GrumpyEd View Post
    Thanks!
    That is a big difference especially if you store a lot of images it's using 73% more data. Might be even more difference if it's a truly solid color since even the velvet has a texture. I didn't expect it to be quite that different.
    The image file with pure black circle crop around coin is 468k, so you're right that even the small amount of data in the black velvet background makes an unexpectedly big difference.
    Builder of Custom Coin Photography Setups. PM me with your needs or visit http://macrocoins.com

  19. Thanks GrumpyEd, scubalou, Petespockets55 thanked for this post
    Likes GrumpyEd, scubalou, Petespockets55 liked this post
 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •