(2 More 1946-S inverted)( 2 1929-S inverted

[RWhitehall]

Hello All
Have visited many times, but never posted before. The coins I just posted Two 1946-S inverted S And Two 1929-S inverted S. I will be sending these to J. Boardner tomorrow.
Thanks.

[RWBILLER]

hey
welcome to LCR
roger

[Brad]

Welcome. The 46 looks right, not sure about the other one. Let us know.

[jcuve]

Welcome to LCR!

The '46 is inverted and I think the first example is an earlier die state than I have personally seen, maybe between EMDS and MDS.

The '29s are from two different dies. The first is a bit worn and the second '29 took a hit which will likely make it hard to determine one way or another - of course that would have to be John's call to make. I would think the '29s would almost have to be AU or BU and MDS or earlier to make the correct call...

Thanks for posting and after John see the '46Ss I would like to maybe photograph the first example myself...

http://i732.photobucket.com/albums/ww322/jcuve/1946SIMM-001MDS-LDS.jpg

[DoubleYou]

The two 1946-S IMMs are correct, but the shape of the 1929-S coins appear to be correct for the style. Here is a link to all the San Francisco mintmark styles.
http://www.varietyvista.com/San%20Francisco%20Mintmark%20Styles.htm

Wendell

[DoubleYou]

By the way, found this listing of all the Denver Mint cent mintmarks.
http://www.varietyvista.com/Denver%20Mintmark%20Syles%20Cent.htm

I'm not sure if it is entirely complete, however, as I am sure I have a 1952-D cent with MMS-006.

Wendell

[lineop3]

Awesome way to open your first posting!!! I love it!
Welcome to the forum!

Aisha

[CCC]

I am a little tardy on this post. The 46 S looks good. The 29 S's appear to have been worn some what. Let us know your outcome on the submission. Welcome to the Forum.