You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features.
For more information on registration and an upgrade to Paid and Premium Memberships go to our Membership page and join our community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
This just looks weird to me that the (2) looks like a minor class VI.
Im not sure and may just send this coin out sometime in the future!
Do you see what Im talking about ?
It is a large date but it looks like the (2) is thicker then normal.Or it could just look like that.
this whole 82 thing has been driving me crazy!!Thank you thou!!
It is a large date but it looks like the (2) is thicker then normal.Or it could just look like that.
this whole 82 thing has been driving me crazy!!Thank you thou!!
It drove me nuts on the 82's until I put together a full set of all 7 82's large/small zinc/copper
Never give up Mikee... The 2 does look extra thick to me also... That or the 198 is extra thin... I have been going over my 82s recently and to me something does not look correct with yours compared to what I've seen... I'm no pro though... LOL!!!
Jim (A.K.A. Elmer Fudd) Be verwy verwy quiet... I'm hunting coins!!! Good Hunting!!!
Comment