I look for the exact error as in the classic examples, but I think there may be some not so classic. Today I want to leave my doubts with this specimen to expose.
2006 is or is not?
Collapse
X
-
There's no error. It's environmentally damaged. Just a stain from something.“What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence.” -
You need to be more specific about what you are asking. Are you asking about the faint doubling under the earlobe or the discoloration or what?All opinions expressed are not necessarily shared by willbrooks or his affiliates. Taking them may result in serious side effects. Results may vary. Offer not valid in New Jersey.Comment
-
I guess I should have looked closer at the coin. Yes, please point out to us exactly what it is you are asking about.“What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence.”Comment
-
The doubling still looks like part of the stain to me, but is it raised?“What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence.”Comment
-
Even though the "doubling" looks to be in the shape of the earlobe, I would lean toward that being coincidental and it is most likely just more corrosion. It would probably need to be examined in-hand to be 100% certain, but if it smells like a pig, it usually is.
edit: And the more I look at your photo, the more I am certain it is part of the corrosion.Last edited by willbrooks; 04-05-2013, 10:45 AM.All opinions expressed are not necessarily shared by willbrooks or his affiliates. Taking them may result in serious side effects. Results may vary. Offer not valid in New Jersey.Comment
Comment