2006 is or is not?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • lincent
    Member
    • Feb 2012
    • 52

    #1

    2006 is or is not?

    I look for the exact error as in the classic examples, but I think there may be some not so classic. Today I want to leave my doubts with this specimen to expose.
    Attached Files
  • jallengomez
    Member
    • Jan 2010
    • 4447

    #2
    There's no error. It's environmentally damaged. Just a stain from something.
    “What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence.”

    Comment

    • willbrooks
      Die & Design Expert, LCF Glossary Author

      • Jan 2012
      • 9473

      #3
      You need to be more specific about what you are asking. Are you asking about the faint doubling under the earlobe or the discoloration or what?
      All opinions expressed are not necessarily shared by willbrooks or his affiliates. Taking them may result in serious side effects. Results may vary. Offer not valid in New Jersey.

      Comment

      • jallengomez
        Member
        • Jan 2010
        • 4447

        #4
        I guess I should have looked closer at the coin. Yes, please point out to us exactly what it is you are asking about.
        “What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence.”

        Comment

        • lincent
          Member
          • Feb 2012
          • 52

          #5
          You are right. I mean doubling faint under the earlobe. Thank you.

          Comment

          • jallengomez
            Member
            • Jan 2010
            • 4447

            #6
            The doubling still looks like part of the stain to me, but is it raised?
            “What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence.”

            Comment

            • lincent
              Member
              • Feb 2012
              • 52

              #7
              Yes, it is little bit raised

              Comment

              • willbrooks
                Die & Design Expert, LCF Glossary Author

                • Jan 2012
                • 9473

                #8
                Even though the "doubling" looks to be in the shape of the earlobe, I would lean toward that being coincidental and it is most likely just more corrosion. It would probably need to be examined in-hand to be 100% certain, but if it smells like a pig, it usually is.

                edit: And the more I look at your photo, the more I am certain it is part of the corrosion.
                Last edited by willbrooks; 04-05-2013, 10:45 AM.
                All opinions expressed are not necessarily shared by willbrooks or his affiliates. Taking them may result in serious side effects. Results may vary. Offer not valid in New Jersey.

                Comment

                Working...