PDA

View Full Version : The rant of a raging message board lunatic...



coppercoins
07-22-2013, 10:20 AM
This post is in response to someone saying that I am rather 'short' in some of my responses, and my retort was that I have a few very passionate areas that - when crossed - do tend to make me a rather abrasive responder.

Feel free to chime in!

I do have a few points of passion that I stand by and will stand by to my grave because they are important to a thorough understanding of coin collecting (especially collecting valuable die varieties and errors) as a whole. When I am challenged on these points, I become defensive and abrupt because I do understand them, believe they don't take a lot of effort to understand, and believe those who have had time to absorb the hobby and STILL don't understand are hard-headed and don't want to really understand. Those Points:

1. Die varieties, varieties, and errors are three entirely different things collected by entirely different subsets of collectors and specialists. Calling one the other isn't okay, the terms are NOT interchangeable, and anyone who publishes that it is okay to mix them is irresponsible.

2. Dealers as a whole across the country are woefully undereducated in die varieties, varieties, and errors, and people who come here and post the blather their dealer told them makes this point painfully obvious. Dealers need to learn the coins or be prepared to tell customers that they don't know what they are doing when it comes to the error/variety market. This entire statement does excuse the three percent of dealers who DO care and DO learn.

3. There is no such thing as an "opinion" when it comes to what we are doing. Die variety and error identification is a very specific science, and there is no room for opinion in science. It either definitely is, or definitely is NOT...no middle ground. Offer facts or specifically state that you are guessing when you are indeed guessing, but don't make the original poster guess which you are doing.

4. Touching a bit on point #3, a "forum common courtesy" public announcement: Unnecessary are the people who come into a thread and offer their often-incorrect "opinions" after someone has already posted the correct answer to the OPs question. Not only is it showing how many times someone can be incorrect over and over, but it devalues the facts stated by the seasoned collector especially to a non-collector or beginner OP. They don't know who to believe, and offering guesses and opinions on top of a correct answer is misleading. Basically - if someone has already given the correct answer - back them up with additional posts, but don't offer additional unclear, incorrect, and misleading 'information' that steer the OP away from the correct response already given.

5. Die cracks, die chips, and machine doubling may be of interest to a number of more novice collectors, but they are not covered under the blanket of items that are "generally" purchased at a premium by those who know the market because they understand WHY die varieties and certain errors have value and these don't. Collecting them is up to the collector, but dying with an unexplained collection full of machine doubling is irresponsible. Do something about it BEFORE you die if you're going to collect them. You'll be doing your heirs a BIG favor if they know ahead of time that they should just take your collection to the bank instead of wasting time and money trying to get a serious offer for your "collection".

Those, folks, are my main "pet peeves" in collecting and in numismatic specialty forums as a whole.

simonm
07-22-2013, 10:33 AM
Chuck, I think you make some valid and strong points.
Just for clarification for my (and perhaps other peoples') sake, what is the main difference between a die variety and jut a "variety"? Is "die variety" a broad term for things such as transitional die varieties, repunched mintmarks and doubled dies, while a "variety" is a more specific term in the categories? Just trying to understand. Thanks in advance for the response.

coppercoins
07-22-2013, 10:41 AM
Sure..

A "die variety" is a mistake made during the die making process that often leaves doubling to some degree on the resulting die. Doubled dies and mintmark varieties (RPMs and OMMs) fall into this term. ALL of the coins minted with the die variety will reflect the issue with the design on the die.

A "variety" is like a large date, small date, mintmark styles, transitional reverses, etc. They are intended design changes that were NOT intended to be collected as different issues. It's the eagle-eye of numismatists who pick out these differences and collect them.

I am considering a crusade into renaming the term "variety" because it is too vague. I want to start calling them "issue varieties" so there will be a matching word to go with the word "variety" that explains what they are.

So we have:

"Die variety" - a die for die problem that happened during die creation.

"issue variety" - a difference in the design placed on a single date/mintmark issue that was intended, but not intended to be noticed or collected. These create a different "issue" to collectors, hence, 1960 LD and 1960 SD.

hasfam
07-22-2013, 10:43 AM
4. Touching a bit on point #3, a "forum common courtesy" public announcement: Unnecessary are the people who come into a thread and offer their often-incorrect "opinions" after someone has already posted the correct answer to the OPs question. Not only is it showing how many times someone can be incorrect over and over, but it devalues the facts stated by the seasoned collector especially to a non-collector or beginner OP. They don't know who to believe, and offering guesses and opinions on top of a correct answer is misleading. Basically - if someone has already given the correct answer - back them up with additional posts, but don't offer additional unclear, incorrect, and misleading 'information' that steer the OP away from the correct response already given.


I'm glad this was brought up, and it was you that brought it up Chuck. I was afraid to say anything about this part of the forum for fear of "starting trouble or being looked upon as a "whiner". But people will listen to you. This has been a sort spot with me for a long time. It leads to confusion and often times, credit for the Best Answer when it's not. Anyway, continue to hold your ground.

Maineman750
07-22-2013, 11:29 AM
4. Touching a bit on point #3, a "forum common courtesy" public announcement: Unnecessary are the people who come into a thread and offer their often-incorrect "opinions" after someone has already posted the correct answer to the OPs question. Not only is it showing how many times someone can be incorrect over and over, but it devalues the facts stated by the seasoned collector especially to a non-collector or beginner OP. They don't know who to believe, and offering guesses and opinions on top of a correct answer is misleading. Basically - if someone has already given the correct answer - back them up with additional posts, but don't offer additional unclear, incorrect, and misleading 'information' that steer the OP away from the correct response already given.



I feel this is an area that the moderators could help with by deleting the misleading posts if deemed necessary. I'll bring it up in the Mod Squad forum to see if Brad and the others agree.

coppercoins
07-22-2013, 11:43 AM
You may use my words directly in the Mod Squad meeting - in the event you might be awaiting my permission to do so. I am quite passionate about that point, and would love to see it very clearly confronted and promptly handled.

mikediamond
07-22-2013, 12:05 PM
In error-ref.com we don't speak of "varieties" or "issue varieties", but we use a number of terms to embrace the sorts of variants you're talking about. "Subtypes", "conceptual design flaws", and "design modifications" are just three of these terms. We choose to employ a greater number of more precise terms, instead of using an overly-broad and ambiguous umbrella terms like "variety" or "issue variety". Consult our checklist to see how we approach the problem: http://www.error-ref.com/Error_and_Variety_Check_List.html