2009D DDO?

[jmangham]

I am seeing some extra thickness on LIBERTY. What do you guys think? Maybe 2009D-1DO-001?

http://www.lincolncentforum.com/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=99741&stc=1
http://www.lincolncentforum.com/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=99748&stc=1
http://www.lincolncentforum.com/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=99752&stc=1
http://www.lincolncentforum.com/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=99753&stc=1

Here is LIBERTY on a regular 2009:
http://www.lincolncentforum.com/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=99754&stc=1

[jfines69]

Liberty does look thick... There may be some extra thickness in the hair and beard... My vision isn't to good rite now... Does the 2 have a slight buldge???

[jmangham]

Does the 2 have a slight buldge???

I looked for that but I don't see it. Although I can't see it on CC either. :tinysmile_hmm_t2:

ERTY looks the very similar to me though.

[mustbebob]

Something like this requires markers to identify the variety. There are too many that are similar to arbitrarily make an attribution based on the LIBERTY alone.

[jmangham]

Something like this requires markers to identify the variety. There are too many that are similar to arbitrarily make an attribution based on the LIBERTY alone.

Does LIBERTY look thick enough to be considered doubled?

Thanks

[jcuve]

There appears to be some extra thickness, still rather minor. We see far fewer Denver doubled dies, I'm not sure how that plays into it being listable or not. If there where some distortion or notching that would help. Nice photos and good eyes.

[mustbebob]

This one would be difficult to list as a DDO, even as a Denver mint example.