1909-S (No VDB) Real?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • keelonzo
    • Nov 2025

    #1

    1909-S (No VDB) Real?

    Greetings all!

    First let me say this group has been EXTREMELY helpful while becoming interested in numismatics, specifically the Lincoln Cent.

    So my Mom shared her collection with me and I've been examining each coin as it is in a whitman folder (still debating whether to transfer the coins into 2x2's) During my examination I saw her 1909 S cent that looks a little (ok alot) damaged. On the obverse there is a "hole" in the "0" and the reverse someone scratched haphazardly the initials V.D.B. into it.

    I'm looking for your opinion if this is a fake/altered date or just damaged and defaced? Regardless it is definitely a curiosity and was acquired in that condition by my Mom in pocket change when she was a kid.

    Thanks for your feedback in advance!

    (Oh and I apologize about the watermark - I forgot to turn it off when exporting from lightroom and it's 3:28 AM and I'm not re-exporting it lol)
  • amosamos16
    Member
    • Jan 2011
    • 706

    #2
    Some knucklehead scratched the initials on the back of a 09 s in a attempt to
    Make it look like a svdb. They probably didn't know the 09 s, itself is a valuable coin. Maybe it was a kid many years ago. It's a shame. Post a pic, but that's what it's sounds like.

    Comment

    • coppercoins
      Lincoln Cent Variety Expert
      • Dec 2008
      • 2482

      #3
      It's really not possible to tell if a coin is genuine or counterfeit without at least seeing a good photo.
      Charles D. Daughtrey, NLG, Author, "Looking Through Lincoln Cents"
      [URL="http://www.coppercoins.com/"]http://www.coppercoins.com[/URL]

      Comment

      • RWBILLER
        Member
        • Jul 2008
        • 6870

        #4
        Welcome to LCR!
        Roger
        ""Time and Tide wait for no man"

        Comment

        • keelonzo

          #5
          Sorry - I guess LCR doesn't like my version of firefox. Here are the pics!
          Attached Files

          Comment

          • pman860507
            Member
            • Jan 2012
            • 1577

            #6
            I'm my opinion the S doesnt looks right, cant even see the V.D.B.

            I'm not a master at anything coin. so chances are I'm wrong.
            Casey Parman

            Comment

            • keelonzo

              #7
              Originally posted by pman860507
              I'm my opinion the S doesnt looks right, cant even see the V.D.B.

              I'm not a master at anything coin. so chances are I'm wrong.
              It's definitely NOT VDB, however I want to know if it is an S or just a fake. Thanks for looking!

              Comment

              • Maineman750
                Administrator

                • Apr 2011
                • 12077

                #8
                There is so much damage I would be afraid to guess...but even if it is authentic...the damage lowers the value so much, I think it really doesn't matter...just my two cents
                https://www.ebay.com/sch/maineman750...75.m3561.l2562

                Comment

                • coop
                  Member
                  • Jan 2012
                  • 2754

                  #9
                  The mint mark is the wrong shape. Here are some images of the 1909-S VDB positions, but note images 5 & 6 on this collage:
                  Richard S. Cooper Some have asked about my images I use, and I'm glad to say I've completed a DVD of these. Ask if you are interested. Newer members like these.

                  Comment

                  • pman860507
                    Member
                    • Jan 2012
                    • 1577

                    #10
                    .... Hey coop I dont see any pictures.
                    Casey Parman

                    Comment

                    • keelonzo

                      #11
                      Originally posted by coop
                      The mint mark is the wrong shape. Here are some images of the 1909-S VDB positions, but note images 5 & 6 on this collage:

                      I've seen a couple of these guides peppered throughout the net, BUT, it raises an additional question. Were the same dies used for the "non-vdb" versions of the coin? Giving it quick thought with the resources they had at the time I would assume that the same "S Mint" Dies would be used for the obverse because that side of the coin remained the same.

                      Oh well. I'll keep it in the book as a filler for when I acquire the genuine article.

                      Ooh ooh... one more thing. I know this question should probably be asked elsewhere and if it is such a drastic violation please let me know, BUT - If I have a coin that looks "proof-like," but has no "pinwheel" mint luster I am to assume that it has been cleaned?

                      Thanks again!

                      Comment

                      • rlm's cents
                        Member
                        • Aug 2011
                        • 453

                        #12
                        No, they did not use the same dies for the VDB as they did for the non-VDB. However, they did used the same punch for the mintmark. In fact they used it until 1916 (and on all San Francisco minted coins in that era I believe). http://www.lincolncentresource.com/S...rk_Styles.html What coop is trying to show you is that your "S" does not look like the "S" used for his pictures. The positions for the non-VDB coin will be different than those he has pictured.

                        BTW, you "prooflike" sounds like it has been polished.
                        Last edited by rlm's cents; 03-28-2012, 03:33 PM.
                        http://boards.collectors-society.com.../40238/sig.jpg

                        Comment

                        • RWBILLER
                          Member
                          • Jul 2008
                          • 6870

                          #13
                          Hi
                          Looking at that coin - just makes me feel something is wrong, but it certainly a conversation piece.
                          Roger
                          ""Time and Tide wait for no man"

                          Comment

                          • Maineman750
                            Administrator

                            • Apr 2011
                            • 12077

                            #14
                            I've gotta admit I'm amazed that you guys can id a mint mark that's smashed flatter than a pancake...I can barely discern the 0
                            https://www.ebay.com/sch/maineman750...75.m3561.l2562

                            Comment

                            • keelonzo

                              #15
                              Thank you to everyone who weighed in!

                              Especially rlm's cents! Very insightfull...

                              you folks might have opened pandora's box of questions as I capture more images.


                              BTW --- From which direction is it best to light from? The ones above were all 45 degrees to camera right and about 15 degrees from the surface of the coin. I'm using a Sony a700 with a 300mm Quantaray POS 5000(but it has a macro function), Nikon SB 28 Strobe(s) only used one for the images though. I'm using off camera flash so I can put it wherever I need to create the best environment for the details to be discerned.

                              The settings were 1/4 power from 3 feet for the flash and ISO 100 1/15 shutter speed @ f27

                              If there are any threads that tackle this please point me in the proper direction.


                              THANKS AGAIN!!

                              Comment

                              Working...