Just found this while CRH'ing. Having a hard time telling if it was like this when struck or if there is something else going on here. The outer edge of the coin is unplated except for the area by the date. But, the obv and rev rim, appears to be plated all the way around. Under magnification, it does not exhibit any trace of acid damage. I'm perplexed. Any theories?
Partial plating or PMD?
Collapse
X
-
Tags: None
-
I'm not seeing it, but what you are describing sounds like plate split doubling. Jason has an excellent article about it as well as photos here:Just found this while CRH'ing. Having a hard time telling if it was like this when struck or if there is something else going on here. The outer edge of the coin is unplated except for the area by the date. But, the obv and rev rim, appears to be plated all the way around. Under magnification, it does not exhibit any trace of acid damage. I'm perplexed. Any theories?
“What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence.” -
Sorry, but this isn't even close. Nothing appears to be split, nor is there any doubling.I'm not seeing it, but what you are describing sounds like plate split doubling. Jason has an excellent article about it as well as photos here:
http://www.errorvariety.com/OFD/PSD.htmlComment
-
“What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence.”Comment
-
Comment
-
Tell me what kind of lighting you used for the pictures and I'll try to white balance it in photoshop, but I'm seeing a normal Cent. There are simple chemistry experiments though to turn a Cent silver(and gold). Here's how it's done:
Last edited by jallengomez; 05-24-2011, 08:24 PM.“What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence.”Comment
-
Okay...the lighting is very warm, but I think I see the big picture now...post mint would be my guess.“What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence.”Comment
-
Althought the copper plating is thin, if it were a plating issue you would see a definite deliniation where the remaining copper bordered the underlying zinc. Looks like a smooth transition from the photos, so as copperlover pointed out it's probably a chemical alteration.“What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence.”Comment
-
I would agree it seems more like the existing plating was altered by way of chemical or heat, but I really cannot say for sure without maybe a closeup photo of a transition area. As Jody pointed out, the plating has a definable thickness and there will be a particular transition between the two surfaces. If there is such a transition, then we'll need the coin's weight.
Jason Cuvelier
MadDieClashes.com - ErrorVariety.com
TrailDies.com - Error-ref.com - Port.Cuvelier.org
CONECA
(images © Jason Cuvelier 2008-18)___________________Comment

Be verwy verwy quiet... I'm hunting coins!!! 
Comment