Tweet
Do you think it's possible for this to be an RPM?
To me it looks like a D on top of the other and clear separation of the two.
Aisha
To me it looks like a D on top of the other and clear separation of the two.
Aisha
-
Last edited by lineop3; 10-19-2012, 08:41 AM. -
I'm thinking it is slight surface damage from general circulation.Wendell Carper
It's a bird! It's a plane! Aw nuts... It's merely two die scratches!
-
Wendell - That may also be a problem punch..Comment
-
Okay...anybody, what's a problem punch?
AishaComment
-
I am not aware of any problem or defective punches used in 1981 Eric. Aisha,
I don't think this is an RPM either. I think Wendell made the right call on this one.Bob Piazza
Former Lincoln Cent Attributer Coppercoins.comComment
-
-
Problem punch A.K.A. Damaged punch... It's either 1978D or 1979D with a broken punch... I agree with Bob and Wendell!!!Jim
(A.K.A. Elmer Fudd)
Be verwy verwy quiet... I'm hunting coins!!! Good Hunting!!!
Comment
-
Ok, OK, educate me here. What I see from the pic on the lower serif yes could be a hit but also could be part of a well used punch starting to seperate. That is what the post was TRYING to state. I should have stated a well used punch but I may be wrong there also..... Sorry all... It's not an RPM like everyone stated Aisha, sorry I muddied the waters!Comment
-
Amen Jim.
I appreciate all the replies given on this cent.
I never seen it before and needed to know what was going on with it.
eaxtellcoins...you're good. No harm...no foul. I thought I had something new to learn about, thanks!
AishaComment
-
There are some 1982 D with that broken punch which make the mint mark look slightly like a repunched mint mark.
I guess we still haven't seen all of the possible such anomalies.
JeanComment
Comment