Is this a large over small date or vise versa? dammmit Ok hold on having technical difficulties with this new digi usb micro i bought, i gotta take the pics with my old digi.
1960 large over small?
Collapse
X
-
-
The 1960-S is a SD, the 1960 is a LD. No doubled dies (or in other words no large over small dates), sorry. I see some MD, circulation wear...basically normal coins...
Jason Cuvelier
MadDieClashes.com - ErrorVariety.com
TrailDies.com - Error-ref.com - Port.Cuvelier.org
CONECA
(images © Jason Cuvelier 2008-18)___________________Comment
-
Jason Cuvelier
MadDieClashes.com - ErrorVariety.com
TrailDies.com - Error-ref.com - Port.Cuvelier.org
CONECA
(images © Jason Cuvelier 2008-18)___________________Comment
-
Thanks for that!
I think i found one btw 1960 d small over large well not sure but u be the judge.Last edited by Guest; 01-13-2013, 05:13 AM.Comment
-
Are they suppose to stick out like a sore thumb? anyways i got this new usb microscope not too sure if its infrared or blacklight u can see 2 double one over the other, i compared this one(recent pics posted) to others and this is the only one that has the date over date...i dunno maybe it is machine doubling. but thanks the response!Comment
-
It is a large date, and as Alex noted, has what might be MD. It takes time to get used the various quirks of different designs and design anomalies that are commonly present on coins. The last coin pictured looks entirely normal to me, accept that the coin's surface has been altered by rubbing of some sort.
There is one known die pairing, on a 1960-D, that was from a small and a large hubbing. It looks exactly like the below. The MM will be in the same place, along with the RPM north (blue arrow). The back arrow shows a MDS die marker, the green arrows show areas of doubling:
Jason Cuvelier
MadDieClashes.com - ErrorVariety.com
TrailDies.com - Error-ref.com - Port.Cuvelier.org
CONECA
(images © Jason Cuvelier 2008-18)___________________Comment

Comment