Worn 1928S small or large date?

[amnight]

I wanted to know if anyone can tell if this is a large or small date. The first picture is the coin in question. The second picture is of all 3: Large, MM in question, and small. I was thinking it might be really worn making it look bigger. But, I noticed the tail and the top serif look kind of like the large style. Also, it might be too worn to tell anything. Thanks for the help!

[Maineman750]

Looks like a small S (mint mark,not date) notice how thick the upper part of the S is, here is a good comparison http://www.lincolncentresource.com/1928mintmarks.html

[willbrooks]

I agree with Roger that it is a "small S."

[coppercoins]

Your coin is the more common small mintmark.

[jcuve]

When the so called small mintmark (MMS-002) is punched more deeply, the overall size starts to get similar to the larger S (MMS-003). Add in circulation wear, and I can understand the confusion. The diagonal cross bar is thicker as are the serifs which are also more well defined. Below, my collage is to scale. The lower right MMS-002 shows the punch deeper than the example above.

[amnight]

I see what you are talking about jcuve. Thanks to everyone who replied!