It is generally accepted that 4 known obverse dies were utilized in striking the 484,000 1909-S VDB cents. This was a production run encompassing a very short time frame.
How many coin presses did the San Francisco Mint have in operation at the time?
Were the cents struck on 4 different presses simultaneously?
Anyway that averages to 121,000 stikes per obverse die leaving each with a substantial remaining production life of maybe 300,000 to 400,000 (possibly even greater) strikes each.
After the transition to the new reverse the mint struck an additional 1,825,000 cents. A short run in itself.
So were the VDB obverse dies also retired with the old reverse dies or transitioned and paired with the new reverse dies? If transitioned these dies would represent a significant amount of the 1909-S production. These 4 dies plus the 2 known RPM's could account for the entire 1909-S production run.
Has anyone done a study on this?
How many coin presses did the San Francisco Mint have in operation at the time?
Were the cents struck on 4 different presses simultaneously?
Anyway that averages to 121,000 stikes per obverse die leaving each with a substantial remaining production life of maybe 300,000 to 400,000 (possibly even greater) strikes each.
After the transition to the new reverse the mint struck an additional 1,825,000 cents. A short run in itself.
So were the VDB obverse dies also retired with the old reverse dies or transitioned and paired with the new reverse dies? If transitioned these dies would represent a significant amount of the 1909-S production. These 4 dies plus the 2 known RPM's could account for the entire 1909-S production run.
Has anyone done a study on this?
Comment