You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features.
For more information on registration and an upgrade to Paid and Premium Memberships go to our Membership page and join our community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
I agree, circulation wear. There are many factors that make devices on a coin look different. Damage, die wear, circulation wear, etc. It is almost impossible to assess such characteristics without using uncirculated coins, understanding the characteristics of the design in question and an understanding of the multistage die making process. That said, I don't think anyone will be finding a switch in styles for the date on a Lincoln cent. A change to the design or a mismatched design (like the 1999 WAM) on a Lincoln reverse is possible. The obverses have been looked at and studied by so many, for so long, that a different styled date couldn't have gone undetected for all these years.
Comment