1992 Close AM FG???

Collapse
X
Collapse
+ More Options
Posts
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Dearing
    Member
    • Sep 2018
    • 988

    #1

    1992 Close AM FG???

    Does this look like the close AM designer's initials? The AM is slightly parted but not as much as the rest of my 92's. On the close up I just can't tell...
    Attached Files
  • willbrooks
    Die & Design Expert, LCF Glossary Author

    • Jan 2012
    • 9473

    #2
    It is a normal rdv6. Wide am
    Die wear and excessive polishing can alter the distance between the bottoms of the A and M. If you use this as your primary pick-up point, which I don't recommend, you should look at the entire AME.
    Last edited by willbrooks; 05-24-2019, 02:59 PM.
    All opinions expressed are not necessarily shared by willbrooks or his affiliates. Taking them may result in serious side effects. Results may vary. Offer not valid in New Jersey.

    Comment

    • Dearing
      Member
      • Sep 2018
      • 988

      #3
      Originally posted by willbrooks
      It is a normal rdv6. Wide am
      Die wear and excessive polishing can alter the distance between the bottoms of the A and M. If you use this as your primary pick-up point, which I don't recommend, you should look at the entire AME.
      oh ok, thank ya, I can usually tell, right off the bat but this one let doubt set in lol thanks again.

      Comment

      • jfines69
        Paid Member

        • Jun 2010
        • 28595

        #4
        The designers initials are messed up on yours... Looks like mostly die wear and possibly some localized slide MD as shown on Error Ref that can really mess with the appearance of a devices location... Hope that helps a bit!!!
        Jim
        (A.K.A. Elmer Fudd) Be verwy verwy quiet... I'm hunting coins!!! Good Hunting!!!

        Comment

        Working...