I'm trying to expand my die knowledge from the Forum's Glossary (a superb glossary it is!). I have a roll of 72 Red's, where perhaps 70-80% of the coins have an obverse misaligned die punch, the reverse mush less so, if any at all. I originally thought they were off-center strikes, but the Glossary corrected me.
I noticed the coins are noticeably "thinner" where the mis-alignment comes closest to the rim. How does the hammer die mis-alignment create the thinness if the planchet is still bound by the collar? I tried to think 3 dimensional, but the only theory I could come up with is the hammer die is mis-aligned "east/west" (horizontal) as well as "north/south" (verticle). I'm probably missing something obvious, but I guess that's my learning curve showing.
Kevin
I noticed the coins are noticeably "thinner" where the mis-alignment comes closest to the rim. How does the hammer die mis-alignment create the thinness if the planchet is still bound by the collar? I tried to think 3 dimensional, but the only theory I could come up with is the hammer die is mis-aligned "east/west" (horizontal) as well as "north/south" (verticle). I'm probably missing something obvious, but I guess that's my learning curve showing.
Kevin


Be verwy verwy quiet... I'm hunting coins!!! 
Comment