You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features.
For more information on registration and an upgrade to Paid and Premium Memberships go to our Membership page and join our community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
I would call it a mint error since the reverse of 89 was inadvertently used on the 1988s. Others would call it a variety though, but I would stick with error.
Bob Piazza
Former Lincoln Cent Attributer Coppercoins.com
I am squarely on the fence. On one hand the die installation error occurred before coins were struck fulfilling some collectors' requirements for a "variety," on the other hand it is by no means intentional such as the change from VDB to no VDB on the 1909 Lincoln which is a true variety so the '88/'89 could be an error. Of course my explanation leads to a place where DDOs and RPMs could also not be called varieties...and I just have not figured it out yet. I do feel that to many collectors, when something moves into the "variety" camp it becomes more coveted.
Thinking about this debate, and writing about it, is giving me headache...
Snowman... the mint purposely changing the reverse was not the case here, but if it was an intentional act, I would agree that it would then be called a variety. Since it was a mistake, that's where I would say it was a mint error. An error and mistake are the same thing in my book. I think we get into semantics with these things after a while as some folks call the Wide AM an error, while others call it a variety. Most people associate an error with the striking of a coin, and that's where the definition is somewhat vague. Is there a right answer to this question? I don't know, but what you call it doesn't affect what it is to a collector.
Bob Piazza
Former Lincoln Cent Attributer Coppercoins.com
Comment