Tweet
Which is harder to located the Large S variation or the smaller S. it took me to remember which year had the change over but just wondering which is harder to find in the wild.
-
<3
In memory of Tiggar 5/21/1994 - 5/28/2010 <3 WAM Count : 025 .
Founder of the NDCCA. ** NDCCA Catalog Database Total. : 2,735. ** -- Jay -- -
<3 In memory of Tiggar 5/21/1994 - 5/28/2010 <3 WAM Count : 025 .
Founder of the NDCCA. ** NDCCA Catalog Database Total. : 2,735. ** -- Jay -- -
The large S is more rare, but I seem to remember that both are not that hard to find.
RockRock
My LCR Photo Album of Graded Lincoln Cent Cherry Picker VarietiesComment
-
hmm maybe i never paid much attention i saw the 2 different ones and was like this is cool. i wonder how common these are. I remember one year having a change over like that. Also i know we have a page for all different mint mark changes. just didnt know which was common if not both were.
----
wasnt there a narrow and wide 4 in one of these wheat years in the 1940s the date got a moderate restyle on the 4?<3 In memory of Tiggar 5/21/1994 - 5/28/2010 <3 WAM Count : 025 .
Founder of the NDCCA. ** NDCCA Catalog Database Total. : 2,735. ** -- Jay --Comment
-
The Large S is harder to find, but both are common. Of the mintmark varieties, a 1928 Large S in uncirculated condition is very scarce. The rest are common. Look for 1941 Large S in PCGS holders (unlabeled) - they are out there I have seen at least 5 of them in person. Also, the Large S seems to have more rpms.Comment
-
I would think a perfect MM would be the rarest... LOL!!!Jim
(A.K.A. Elmer Fudd)
Be verwy verwy quiet... I'm hunting coins!!! Good Hunting!!!
Comment
-
40% large S, 60% small S mint marks.
BJ NeffANA, CCC, CONECA, FUN, Fly-In-Club, NLG & "The Error-Variety Education Consortium"Comment
Comment