Question About Proof Dies

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • jallengomez
    Member
    • Jan 2010
    • 4447

    #1

    Question About Proof Dies

    Are proof dies created from the same master dies and master hubs as the business strike dies? The reason I ask is that tonight I've been searching about 100 1964 pf Cents, and have discovered master doubling. However, I checked a few of my '64 business strikes and have yet to find it.
    “What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence.”
  • jallengomez
    Member
    • Jan 2010
    • 4447

    #2
    Nevermind. Obviously I didn't think about that one, what with the WAMs and CAMs.
    “What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence.”

    Comment

    • jcuve
      Moderator, Die & Variety Expert
      • Apr 2008
      • 15458

      #3
      It is my understanding they should, unless there is a subtle design difference, come from the same master die. I have noticed that sometimes proofs either show more than, or less than known engraving or master die doubling. It could also be a doubled working hub. Post pics...



      Jason Cuvelier


      MadDieClashes.com - ErrorVariety.com
      TrailDies.com - Error-ref.com - Port.Cuvelier.org
      CONECA

      (images © Jason Cuvelier 2008-18)___________________

      Comment

      • jallengomez
        Member
        • Jan 2010
        • 4447

        #4
        Thanks Jason. I'll get some pics up tomorrow. The doubling is miniscule, but it's there.
        “What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence.”

        Comment

        • jallengomez
          Member
          • Jan 2010
          • 4447

          #5
          Here are the images Jason. Like I said, minor, but I didn't see anything listed as master doubling for '64 proofs. The same splits can be seen on all the letters of the outer devices.
          Attached Files
          “What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence.”

          Comment

          • jcuve
            Moderator, Die & Variety Expert
            • Apr 2008
            • 15458

            #6
            I agree, that's a minor rotational spread. You have multiples? Do they share any markers? I am not sure how many proof '64s I have to check...



            Jason Cuvelier


            MadDieClashes.com - ErrorVariety.com
            TrailDies.com - Error-ref.com - Port.Cuvelier.org
            CONECA

            (images © Jason Cuvelier 2008-18)___________________

            Comment

            • jallengomez
              Member
              • Jan 2010
              • 4447

              #7
              Jason,

              Every single one I checked last night exhibits this same doubling. I have a stack of them, and yes, multiple die pairs. If this isn't showing on any of yours, I'll send you a couple of them.
              “What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence.”

              Comment

              • mustbebob
                Lincoln Cent Variety Expert
                • Jul 2008
                • 12758

                #8
                I have many 1964 proofs with minor notching. I am not aware of a master die issue though.
                Bob Piazza
                Former Lincoln Cent Attributer Coppercoins.com

                Comment

                • jcuve
                  Moderator, Die & Variety Expert
                  • Apr 2008
                  • 15458

                  #9
                  If there are different die pairings, I can only speculate that either it's doubled working hub or you have multiple minor DDRs that are similar. With so many '64 DDRs already I am not sure which. Nothing I have on hand has minor notching like the example you posted.

                  I doubt it's the master die, someone would have probably noted that already.



                  Jason Cuvelier


                  MadDieClashes.com - ErrorVariety.com
                  TrailDies.com - Error-ref.com - Port.Cuvelier.org
                  CONECA

                  (images © Jason Cuvelier 2008-18)___________________

                  Comment

                  • flyhi3
                    Member
                    • Mar 2012
                    • 3702

                    #10
                    Hmm, very interresting... I am intrigued to say DD, becaus of how many 64 DDRs there were.... either way, neat
                    Alexander Helzel
                    Ecrater eBay Facebook

                    Comment

                    Working...