Not sure if I posted this in the past. I've had it for a while and am just revisiting it.
I am thinking it 1MM-3 based only on the look of the mint mark [lower split] and the matching overlay.
My main hesitation on this attribution is that my coin appears to have a double clash under the chin and neither clash appears to line up with the clash on 1MM-3. Possibly the reverse die was changed out because I am not seeing any signs of a clash on it.
Does anyone have a later copy of 1MM-3 that you could check to see if it has a double clash [If that is what I am seeing]?
Or, does anyone have any thoughts on another variety that it could be?
Thanks for looking.
I am thinking it 1MM-3 based only on the look of the mint mark [lower split] and the matching overlay.
My main hesitation on this attribution is that my coin appears to have a double clash under the chin and neither clash appears to line up with the clash on 1MM-3. Possibly the reverse die was changed out because I am not seeing any signs of a clash on it.
Does anyone have a later copy of 1MM-3 that you could check to see if it has a double clash [If that is what I am seeing]?
Or, does anyone have any thoughts on another variety that it could be?
Thanks for looking.
Comment