You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features.
For more information on registration and an upgrade to Paid and Premium Memberships go to our Membership page and join our community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
They are supposed to be focused on creating a consistent product, currency. Errors is one thing they are trying to avoid and appear to go to great lengths to stop errors from occurring and or being released.
It is not the U. S. Mint that creates intentional errors, it is the employees who work for the mint that do so. There are many questionable examples from the 1857 improbably die clashes to the Wisconsin "hi" and "low" leaf anamlies that appear to have been "added".
The only known error that was created by a U. S. department was the "Dag Hammarskjold" 4 cent stamp that was at first created with an inverted color by accident. The Director of Printing and Engraving decided that everyone should have this "error" stamp and made the rest of that run of stamps with the inverted color. In the end, it was a horrible mistake.
While I do doubt that the U. S. Mint and some of the more notable foreign country mints would stoop to a low point of making intentional "error" coins, I would not put it past other less worthy mints to do so.
Comment