I'm thinking of buying a USB digital microscope camera. One that fits into the eyepiece socket of my stereoscope. Has anyone had any experience with this and what is the opinion. I want to see the coin on my computer screen and I think that way I'll be better able tofocus the picture and control lighting.
USB digital camera
Collapse
X
-
Wendell Carper
It's a bird! It's a plane! Aw nuts... It's merely two die scratches!Comment
-
I'm using a Fuji FinePix through the socket, too. Causes problems because I don't have an adapter that screws right on to the lens of my camara. I thought about buying the adapter, but it still leaves you with that black ring around the edges... which you crop out anyway, but I just "took the plunge" on a USB camara that adapts to my stereoscope. I should have it in a couple of days. If you're gonna spend the dollars (or cents... LOL), get one with good resolution.
-GeoComment
-
Wendell Carper
It's a bird! It's a plane! Aw nuts... It's merely two die scratches!Comment
-
26X to 130 X is just way to much zoom. With that much magnification, people tend to find way to much on a coin. One must remember "every multiple hubbed die (or hub) is a doubled die". With that much magnification, especially when cranked up to 130 X, you start seeing doubling that the average person doesn't see.
Look for one that is around 7.5 X to 35 X and you will be good. As for the USB microscopes, the only thing I do not like is the pixel rating (lower than 3 mega pixels). Now a days, if one is taking good pictures, the pixels should be in the neighborhood of 8 to 10 mega pixels.
BJ NeffANA, CCC, CONECA, FUN, Fly-In-Club, NLG & "The Error-Variety Education Consortium"Comment
-
26X to 130 X is just way to much zoom. With that much magnification, people tend to find way to much on a coin. One must remember "every multiple hubbed die (or hub) is a doubled die". With that much magnification, especially when cranked up to 130 X, you start seeing doubling that the average person doesn't see.
Look for one that is around 7.5 X to 35 X and you will be good. As for the USB microscopes, the only thing I do not like is the pixel rating (lower than 3 mega pixels). Now a days, if one is taking good pictures, the pixels should be in the neighborhood of 8 to 10 mega pixels.
BJ NeffComment
-
Comment
-
Hi Guys.
The link provided by Wendell is actually a digital microscope that can zoom in on objects up to 130x at a resolution of 640x480. I've got one myself, but the resolution leaves you "wanting". It's definitely good for quick reference, but doesn't take the highest quality pics. (Since I got my scope, I rarely use it anymore.)
If you are looking to adapt a camara to your scope (which I think you are) check out this one.
The resolution is better (1280x1024), but it'll cost you a bit more.
There are many others out there, so do little research on your own if your interested in getting a quick education on resolution. This site (LCR Forum) accepts a maximum image size of 1024x768, but in order to get the maximum "quality" image (before tailoring with an imaging application such as Paint or PhotoShop), you'll want to start with a higher resolution image. From there, you'll need to size it before uploading to this forum.
Hope this helps.
Have a great Sunday.
-GeoComment
-
When I was referring to 8 to 10 mega pixels, it was towards a hand held camera and not a USB camera. While I guess USB cameras are good for some, I do a lot of photography work and the lack of pixels in the USB cameras is a concern for me.
BJ NeffANA, CCC, CONECA, FUN, Fly-In-Club, NLG & "The Error-Variety Education Consortium"Comment
Comment