You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features.
For more information on registration and an upgrade to Paid and Premium Memberships go to our Membership page and join our community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
I am confident that this is a Finger Feeder Error. Just as confident as I have been with every other error I believed I had found, and was schooled on the fact that they were all in fact Not errors. Did I finally get one with this 1930 Wheat Penny?
Agreed, if you do an LCR search on the subject of feeder finger scrapes you'll learn a great deal of information.
It's important to remember that feederfinger damage doesn't happen on the coin, but the die itself. The scraped area across the face of the reverse die is then transferred to the coin as a slightly raised anomaly. The scrapes on the die itself are of course incuse, or indented.
[B][FONT=Franklin Gothic Medium][SIZE=2]Chris & Charity Welch- [COLOR=red]LIVEAN[/COLOR][COLOR=black]DIE[/COLOR][COLOR=blue]VARIETIES[/COLOR][/SIZE][/FONT][/B]
[FONT=Franklin Gothic Medium]Purveyors of Modern Treasure [/FONT]
I am assuming you mean die gouges...not gauges. A feeder finger scrape can certainly be considered a gouge. The big difference is that we know the reason on the feeder finger damage, whereas we may not know the reason for any other gouges. Technically, they are all gouges though.
Bob Piazza
Former Lincoln Cent Attributer Coppercoins.com
Feeder finger damage is usually in one direction. It is caused by the feeder finger scraping on the die. After time they will be seen in a sweeping pattern across the die face. A die gouge can be from contact on the die, but in any direction. The object that causes this can be from anything touching the field area of the die. A die dent is contact from another die making a strong mark into the die and usually in a straight/rounded mark on the die. These may be small or large depending on how much contact/impact was made.
Richard S. Cooper Some have asked about my images I use, and I'm glad to say I've completed a DVD of these. Ask if you are interested. Newer members like these.
That is one major feeder finger damage coin. Aisha, Eagle Eye I, can really find the good ones. She is leaving us quite a legacy with all her great posts and finds.
Jean
That is one major feeder finger damage coin. Aisha, Eagle Eye I, can really find the good ones. She is leaving us quite a legacy with all her great posts and finds.
Jean
Thank you everyone for your insight. I appreciate the time you all took to give educated explanations on my non- error cent. Before I posted this wheat cent here in the forum I had of course done my searching the internet for information about this coin and a handful of others. ( all of which I would like to show here at community forums ) While surfing for information I found this article; *Link below*
This article is the reasoning for my not understanding exactly what a Finger Feeder ends up looking like after the attack of the finger. After reading your helpful insight I did venture into the correct very mangled world of Finger Finder Errors.
Well, Here's to having the next post for clarification be the one!
The thing is, anyone can post anything they want on the internet and there's no guarantee that they know what they're talking about. The article you linked to was written by someone who is clueless about mint errors and the minting process.
Comment