Here is an interesting error, I think it is a clash of some kind but I'm not sure. Would like some feedback. Thank you ...............dinkyblue
1966 clash error maybe? not sure
Collapse
X
-
Tags: None
-
Cool... Looks like the mint did their best to remove it... Lots of abrasions... I do not see any signs of a clash on the rev so the rev is not the mate for the clash!!!Jim
(A.K.A. Elmer Fudd)
Be verwy verwy quiet... I'm hunting coins!!! Good Hunting!!!
Comment
-
Thank you Bob, the knowledge that I learned from this site made it possible for me to attribute this correct. That is indeed how I saw this 1966. Thank you also Jim, good to here from you. I have to make this quick as PG&E is about to turn my power off again................dinkyblue outComment
-
Any time my friend... Stay safe!!!Thank you Bob, the knowledge that I learned from this site made it possible for me to attribute this correct. That is indeed how I saw this 1966. Thank you also Jim, good to here from you. I have to make this quick as PG&E is about to turn my power off again................dinkyblue outJim
(A.K.A. Elmer Fudd)
Be verwy verwy quiet... I'm hunting coins!!! Good Hunting!!!
Comment
-
I hope all is well Dan! I was not thinking about how close you may have been to the fires.Thank you Bob, the knowledge that I learned from this site made it possible for me to attribute this correct. That is indeed how I saw this 1966. Thank you also Jim, good to here from you. I have to make this quick as PG&E is about to turn my power off again................dinkyblue outComment
-
Dan, Would you mind if I use your photos? I am getting some examples together of this type of "clash remnant doubling".“What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence.”Comment


Comment