Error Lamination | 1935-D Lam Peel?

[papascoins]

Hello all,
\
I would appreciate any feedback about this well circulated 1935-D. Personally, I think it's an old lam-peel, although someone told me it was a strike-thru. Please look closely and tell me what you think.

Thank You!

[CoinHI]

Nice, more likely it's a lam than a srikethrough. Strikethroughs generally don't show design in the recesses. Weighing the coin will help determine this also.

[willbrooks]

Hey, Mark! How you been? That's surely a lamination peel.

[hasfam]

Very dramatic. A keeper. Congrats.

[papascoins]

Hey, Mark! How you been? That's surely a lamination peel.

Hey, thanks Will!! I wish I had more time to spend on here! And Thanks for your input!

[Petespockets55]

I agree with the lamination peel but the weight would be nice to know.

[papascoins]

I agree with the lamination peel but the weight would be nice to know.

Petespockets55,

It took me a while to find my scale, since my son used it!

Anyway, it is definitely light. I get 2.941871 grams!

Thanks again for looking!

[jfines69]

Looks like a lamination peel... Lots of detail remaining where the out layer fell away... Also the weight drop!!!

[Petespockets55]

Thanks for the weight.
That should eliminate any questions.