1960 D RPM 32 or 40

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • grnwavdav
    Member
    • Oct 2008
    • 2485

    #1

    1960 D RPM 32 or 40

    This ones hard...as a lot of the 1960 D's are...I got it narrowed down between #32 and 40. I'm leaning toward 40 because it's looks like a split upper and lower sherif. Along with the vertical bar that would make it a D/D/D. That's why I think #40. The coin is too circulated to see any die markers. Does anyone else see the split sherifs?
    Attached Files

    David Miller - CONECA member
  • CCC

    #2
    7:00 and 10:00 position. There there. I haven't checked the RPM book yet.

    Comment

    • grnwavdav
      Member
      • Oct 2008
      • 2485

      #3
      Originally posted by CCC
      7:00 and 10:00 position. There there. I haven't checked the RPM book yet.
      I wish I had an RPM book. I can't wait till they release the new one.

      David Miller - CONECA member

      Comment

      • 1sgret

        #4
        Dave: I would go with #40 also by your pic's.

        Comment

        • CCC

          #5
          40 here also between your choices. Congrat's

          Comment

          • RWBILLER
            Member
            • Jul 2008
            • 6870

            #6
            Hi:
            Looks to be a #40. Know you need about 160 more!
            Good find
            Roger
            Roger
            ""Time and Tide wait for no man"

            Comment

            • JeanK
              Member
              • Sep 2008
              • 5696

              #7
              The #40 I see in my book seems to have a left tilted D.
              Are you sure it isn't 39 or 42?

              (I know, here is trouble maker again ...
              Jean

              Comment

              • eaxtellcoin
                Paid Member

                • Jan 2008
                • 2086

                #8
                I think I would agree with the group, Lower serif, position, looks Like #40 but that's a guess!!

                Comment

                Working...