1984-D Thicker LIBERTY and Date?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Utility-Man
    • Apr 2026

    #1

    1984-D Thicker LIBERTY and Date?

    Needs some help, I am trying to compare some extra thickness on this 1984-D on the LIBERTY and Date. I hope the photos are clear enough. Labeled them Thick for the ones I think are thicker and normal to what I had as a "normal" coin.

    But the "extra thickness" gets me. Not always sure but this one feels like it.
    Attached Files
  • GrumpyEd
    Member
    • Jan 2013
    • 7229

    #2
    It is thick. Start by comparing the details, then mintmark location then markers to see if it matches any of the listed ones.

    Comment

    • Utility-Man

      #3
      Thanks GrumpyEd. I will do that. I was starting to and decided to see if my thickness feeling was correct.

      Comment

      • Maineman750
        Administrator

        • Apr 2011
        • 12079

        #4
        It looks normal for the date MM to me....at least in that I see a bunch of them that look thick.
        https://www.ebay.com/sch/maineman750...75.m3561.l2562

        Comment

        • Utility-Man

          #5
          Interesting. Now I will have to pay attention. I have set those aside for now and will look at the next round.

          Comment

          • Maineman750
            Administrator

            • Apr 2011
            • 12079

            #6
            Originally posted by Utility-Man
            I have set those aside for now and will look at the next round.
            That is always a good thing to do.
            https://www.ebay.com/sch/maineman750...75.m3561.l2562

            Comment

            • GrumpyEd
              Member
              • Jan 2013
              • 7229

              #7
              I think liberty is thick, about as thick as some of the listed ones. The date is about normal.
              I do see a lot of 84s that are thick, they might not be doubled dies or not listable ones.

              Always be safe to put it aside.

              Comment

              • Maineman750
                Administrator

                • Apr 2011
                • 12079

                #8
                I agree this is a tough year...I also expect to see a little distortion before I start comparing on CC
                https://www.ebay.com/sch/maineman750...75.m3561.l2562

                Comment

                • trails
                  Moderator, Error Expert
                  • Feb 2008
                  • 3358

                  #9
                  I think that we are placing to much value on the term "extra thickness" to accurately describe a doubled die. If a design element has extra thickness in all quadrants, it is more than likely not a doubled die but a worn die. If a design element has extra thickness in one direction (or in some rare cases two directions), then it may very well be a doubled die. So, to further expand the term extra thickness, it should have the adjective "distorted" attached, or "distorted extra thickness". This term will suffice to accurately describe what is seen on a design element to qualify it as a possible doubled die.

                  BJ Neff
                  ANA, CCC, CONECA, FUN, Fly-In-Club, NLG & "The Error-Variety Education Consortium"

                  Comment

                  • Utility-Man

                    #10
                    All good info. I will hang onto it and look at it with fresh eyes and more coins.

                    Comment

                    Working...