1983 -S Proof RPM I bought a few yesterday from a guy then checked my books. And WaLa 1983 -S PROOF RPM Very Kool!
1983-S Proof RPM
Collapse
X
-
Tags: None
-
-
-
edit: I am seeing what might POSSIBLY be split serifs, but as I said, there is too much reflection to be certain. You would probably have to have one of us look at it in-hand unless you can get some different photos up.Last edited by willbrooks; 06-01-2016, 05:19 PM.All opinions expressed are not necessarily shared by willbrooks or his affiliates. Taking them may result in serious side effects. Results may vary. Offer not valid in New Jersey.Comment
-
I also see a Notch on the bottom right serif the 1983 S RPM on cc shows the same notch
either clear pictures with less reflections or an in hand examine by someone may show what this notch is.
can you take some more pics?
no or less reflections
NOTE this is not RPM 1 on cc. placement is wrong
but why the notch?
I do not have a 1983 proof
Dose the MM look normal or is it notched?Last edited by onecent1909; 06-01-2016, 07:57 PM.Member: Florida State representative for the ANA, Florida state representative for CONECA, F.U.N. and the Ocala Coin ClubComment
-
Are you referring to a split serif(I'm not sure I see it) or the area to the east of the mint mark? If you are referring to the apparent second S to the east, this is a phenomenon unique to proofs because of their double strike, and it's basically a form of MD called flat-field doubling. I don't think we have this in our glossary, so here's a link-
“What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence.”Comment
-
Comment