1995-D DDO or worthless?

[J.Rudd]

2016-07-23 06.59.34.jpg
2016-07-23 08.00.12.jpg
My husband and i are having a disagreement about this one... lol
Is this a true doubling or is it worthless machine doubling? I am studying the coin further... it seems as though we are now looking at the reverse harder.
We believe we could have a true DDR WDDR-02

[J.Rudd]

If u may ask, how come nobody is wanting to help me?

[mustbebob]

There are many reasons why you may not have received a response yet. Sometimes, no one has an opinion, or there may not be anyone on line.

Could you please be a little more specific on what you are seeing that makes you believe this is a possible doubled die. The photos aren't too bad, but could you zoom in a bit on what it is you are seeing??

[J.Rudd]

I was just wondering, I haven't been on here alot lately, I've been working alot. And didn't know if something had changed that I wasn't aware of or something is all. Thanks for responding. And yes I can do that. I hear these aren't that rare at all. In fact someone here told me that I should buy or find this variety and study it closely so that I'll know exactly what to look for in my EVERLASTING hunt for the 1970-S DD
I will get some pics up for you. I'll use my husbands phone though because his pixels and all are much better...

[tomfiggy]

I don't see anything but very minor incuse die deterioration doubling.
Here is a link to the listed doubled die's for that year

http://varietyvista.com/01b%20LC%20Doubled%20Dies%20Vol%202/DDO%201995-D.htm

[J.Rudd]

12356.jpg12362.jpg12359.jpg12383.jpg12377.jpg12371.jpg12383.jpgCM160723-11563108.jpg12386.jpg
Okay, I believe, though very nimute, that I may have the 1995-D WDDR 002.

my husband says its all MD. I studied the obverse and decided quite possibly the same. I know a true DD will not be on both sides. On the reverse however I see some markers, like the doubling of the column that touched the statue, and the end column by the FG, however the appearance of the FG makes me shy away from true DD. Some of the letters have the signs like lines and all.And I did all the work and the dang thing does not want to post... grr... shaking my fist at my phone!

[J.Rudd]

Even with the die markers?

[jfines69]

I do not see the DD from colmun 6 (C6) over to the knee... The DD would be in the same place as the one listed... As for the markers you may have similar markers across several different dies but they will be slightly different... Now if the markers are exactly the same but no DD is there then it would be possible the listed DD is not an actual DD but that would be for the pros to hash out!!!

[enamel7]

Another reason people probably weren't responding is it's Saturday. The forum is always slower on the weekend. Anyway, markers don't make the variety. You should always find the variety first, then look for markers.

[GrumpyEd]

I was looking for a DDO (obverse) so I ignored the reverse.
The bummer about most minor DDRs is that there are a lot of them and most aren't that high in interest because if they only show along the edge of columns there's tons of them out there. So many that I put them in tubes with no ID unless they are pretty easy to see.
And lastly, it may be MD.

Doubled dies could be on both sides, there are some like that but most aren't on both sides. That alone shouldn't make your decision of what it might be.

[enamel7]

Another thing you said doesn't make sense. You said the doubling is the same, only minute. Doubling will be the same no matter what the coin, minus circulation wear and damage. Markers will always be the same depending on what stage it is. I hope this helps.