You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features.
For more information on registration and an upgrade to Paid and Premium Memberships go to our Membership page and join our community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Even thought the pics are a bit blurry (Still better than my pics... LOL) I still see what appears to be a RPM... It may take awhile to find a match on CopperCoins... Nice die chip also... Congrats on a nice find!!!
Jim (A.K.A. Elmer Fudd) Be verwy verwy quiet... I'm hunting coins!!! Good Hunting!!!
Thanks alot for pointing that out to me. I do believe this is a RPM & with these pics you can clearly see both upper & lower "serifs" are spilt (seen best in pic#3) So I think its listed on that site as "1960D-1MM-12". I was unable to find any trace of die clashes on this coin.
So does this coin have 2 seperate errors ?
Last thing I am wondering is about the inside tail of the "9" . It spilts into two seperate tails , is this just part of the "Die chip" with the "6" ?
The "split" on the 9 looks to me like it just took a hit.The clashes are a different error,yes. And yes it looks much like #12, but without better pics I won't go out on a limb.I actually label my 60-D RPM's just as "RPM" because I don't have that much patience with 1960.
Its great that you are trying to determine which RPM you have (the new pictures show it pretty well), but remember, you have a small date 1960 D and the 1MM-012 is a large date. Even though your RPM may look like 1MM-012 it is not. Keep looking on coppercoins. Hopefully it is listed there. I think what you are seeing on the tail of the 9 is a result of master die doubling which is on every 1960 small date.
Its great that you are trying to determine which RPM you have (the new pictures show it pretty well), but remember, you have a small date 1960 D and the 1MM-012 is a large date. Even though your RPM may look like 1MM-012 it is not. Keep looking on coppercoins. Hopefully it is listed there. I think what you are seeing on the tail of the 9 is a result of master die doubling which is on every 1960 small date.
Greg
1960D-1MM-127 is what I was typing & forgot the 7 at the end .There actually isnt a 12 even listed on that website (Are you using the same site or is there another one too?). If you check it you will see what seems to be the exact same coin . & I'm so glad just the past few days to have gotten 3 links to websites that I use daily now , I have learned more in the past few days about coins here on this site, than in my whole life
The "split" on the 9 looks to me like it just took a hit.The clashes are a different error,yes. And yes it looks much like #12, but without better pics I won't go out on a limb.I actually label my 60-D RPM's just as "RPM" because I don't have that much patience with 1960.
If by "hit" you mean some sort of damage , I can tell you that those two tails coming from the tip of the "9" are raised & extend from the 9 perfectly from larger base to smaller/sharper as they reach out . It is very hard to get a good pic of them sorry about that
You are doing a super job on your coin here... As for the split on the "9" if you are unsure as to what it is you may want to send it to one of the attributers... They will check it out and tell exactly what you have... Your pics are pretty good but an in hand inspection is the only way to be sure!!!
Jim (A.K.A. Elmer Fudd) Be verwy verwy quiet... I'm hunting coins!!! Good Hunting!!!
Comment