1962 proof class 6 doubling?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • SuddenAdoration
    Member
    • Nov 2011
    • 918

    #1

    1962 proof class 6 doubling?

    Happy New Year!

    I don't know a lot about proofs... I have this 1962 D and the thickness in the word in trust, especially the S, I think it might be a DDO? Any advise on this is much appreciated!
    Thank you
    Attached Files
    What's the Motto you?! Eh!
  • GrumpyEd
    Member
    • Jan 2013
    • 7229

    #2
    Better take the proof D off the title.


    Not sure but the top of the T is pretty thick!

    Comment

    • mustbebob
      Lincoln Cent Variety Expert
      • Jul 2008
      • 12758

      #3
      That is not typical of class 6 doubling for the year. I would not call it a doubled die. Normally, the bottom of the devices (letters/numbers) would show the distortion and or twisting of the devices. Proof coins were also struck multiple times so maybe this anomaly is related to that or the beginnings of die deterioration.
      Bob Piazza
      Former Lincoln Cent Attributer Coppercoins.com

      Comment

      • jfines69
        Member
        • Jun 2010
        • 28848

        #4
        I'm with Bob... On the close up I see what appears to be a ridge ring developing and the letters appearing stretched out toward the rim... I would have thought that with a proof the mint would have changed the dies sooner???
        Jim
        (A.K.A. Elmer Fudd) Be verwy verwy quiet... I'm hunting coins!!! Good Hunting!!!

        Comment

        • SuddenAdoration
          Member
          • Nov 2011
          • 918

          #5
          That's what happens when I post late at night unfortunately it will not let me change it.

          Originally posted by GrumpyEd
          Better take the proof D off the title.


          Not sure but the top of the T is pretty thick!
          What's the Motto you?! Eh!

          Comment

          • jfines69
            Member
            • Jun 2010
            • 28848

            #6
            Originally posted by SuddenAdoration
            That's what happens when I post late at night unfortunately it will not let me change it.
            PM one of the moderators!!!
            Jim
            (A.K.A. Elmer Fudd) Be verwy verwy quiet... I'm hunting coins!!! Good Hunting!!!

            Comment

            • SuddenAdoration
              Member
              • Nov 2011
              • 918

              #7
              Originally posted by mustbebob
              That is not typical of class 6 doubling for the year. I would not call it a doubled die. Normally, the bottom of the devices (letters/numbers) would show the distortion and or twisting of the devices. Proof coins were also struck multiple times so maybe this anomaly is related to that or the beginnings of die deterioration.
              Thank you Bob for the explanation. That S was throwing me off, especially because it looked like a baby notch on the top end of it. I am looking to hard I guess... haha Thank you though great help!

              Originally posted by jfines69
              I'm with Bob... On the close up I see what appears to be a ridge ring developing and the letters appearing stretched out toward the rim... I would have thought that with a proof the mint would have changed the dies sooner???
              Jim thanks for the added information... that does sound like a good explanation as to why the S would be thicker on the top versus the bottom. I guess they were penny pinching a bit on those dies.
              What's the Motto you?! Eh!

              Comment

              • willbrooks
                Die & Design Expert, LCF Glossary Author

                • Jan 2012
                • 9477

                #8
                I fixed your thread title. And I agree that (surprisingly) there do appear to be signs of die deterioration.

                Very cool avatar, by the way.
                All opinions expressed are not necessarily shared by willbrooks or his affiliates. Taking them may result in serious side effects. Results may vary. Offer not valid in New Jersey.

                Comment

                • SuddenAdoration
                  Member
                  • Nov 2011
                  • 918

                  #9
                  Originally posted by willbrooks
                  I fixed your thread title. And I agree that (surprisingly) there do appear to be signs of die deterioration.

                  Very cool avatar, by the way.
                  Thank you Will!
                  What's the Motto you?! Eh!

                  Comment

                  Working...