You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features.
For more information on registration and an upgrade to Paid and Premium Memberships go to our Membership page and join our community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
I don't know a lot about proofs... I have this 1962 D and the thickness in the word in trust, especially the S, I think it might be a DDO? Any advise on this is much appreciated!
Thank you
That is not typical of class 6 doubling for the year. I would not call it a doubled die. Normally, the bottom of the devices (letters/numbers) would show the distortion and or twisting of the devices. Proof coins were also struck multiple times so maybe this anomaly is related to that or the beginnings of die deterioration.
Bob Piazza
Former Lincoln Cent Attributer Coppercoins.com
I'm with Bob... On the close up I see what appears to be a ridge ring developing and the letters appearing stretched out toward the rim... I would have thought that with a proof the mint would have changed the dies sooner???
Jim (A.K.A. Elmer Fudd) Be verwy verwy quiet... I'm hunting coins!!! Good Hunting!!!
That is not typical of class 6 doubling for the year. I would not call it a doubled die. Normally, the bottom of the devices (letters/numbers) would show the distortion and or twisting of the devices. Proof coins were also struck multiple times so maybe this anomaly is related to that or the beginnings of die deterioration.
Thank you Bob for the explanation. That S was throwing me off, especially because it looked like a baby notch on the top end of it. I am looking to hard I guess... haha Thank you though great help!
Originally posted by jfines69
I'm with Bob... On the close up I see what appears to be a ridge ring developing and the letters appearing stretched out toward the rim... I would have thought that with a proof the mint would have changed the dies sooner???
Jim thanks for the added information... that does sound like a good explanation as to why the S would be thicker on the top versus the bottom. I guess they were penny pinching a bit on those dies.
I fixed your thread title. And I agree that (surprisingly) there do appear to be signs of die deterioration.
Very cool avatar, by the way.
All opinions expressed are not necessarily shared by willbrooks or his affiliates. Taking them may result in serious side effects. Results may vary. Offer not valid in New Jersey.
Comment