You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features.
For more information on registration and an upgrade to Paid and Premium Memberships go to our Membership page and join our community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Hi all! I am wanting to know if the date on this coin has a few die chips in it? I believe so, but the date just looks strange. No biggie, just wanted an answer. Also, could this be a 5 over 5 variety? Thanks, here are pics!
Hmm, could be a small chip in the nine. There's no such thing as a 5 over 5 variety. It looks to me like a hit displaced part of the top of the 5 and pushed it down.
I was on lincolncentresource.com looking at the controversial coins and saw #10 which indicated what may have been a 5 over 5 variety. I thought this showed what could be an example.
I was on lincolncentresource.com looking at the controversial coins and saw #10 which indicated what may have been a 5 over 5 variety. I thought this showed what could be an example.
If you read the entire article, it explains how a 5 over 5 would be impossible
Looks like displaced metal from damage... The entire date took a fairly good hit... IMHO yours is not the controversial 5 over 5... Would have been cool tho!!!
Jim (A.K.A. Elmer Fudd) Be verwy verwy quiet... I'm hunting coins!!! Good Hunting!!!
Comment