The original color of a Lincoln has long been a concerning matter- plenty of people alter the luster or tone of a cent in an attempt to improve the coin or fool a prospective buyer. In the past, the TPGs have been helpful in establishing that a coin has been messed with. But now, anything that looks too nice, is called "questionable color" by PCGS or "recolored" by ANACS. In fact, I've stopped submitting choice MS cents to ANACS because each time I pull a die variety in phenomenal grade out of an original bankwrapped roll, it comes back "recolored". Now I send them to NGC where they get accurately graded, not attributed, but the varieties still bring a good premium for what they are, as opposed to being accused of being a problem coin.
Here's a perfect example: http://www.teletrade.com/coins/lot.a...=3230&lot=1060
My friend in Oregon is helping his neighbor to disperse his collection and settle his estate. One of the incredible items in the collection is an original bankwrapped roll of 1935-S cents. '35-S is a pretty pricey coin in Gem Red condition. My friend pulled a dozen of the nicest (and they're VERY nice) and submitted them to PCGS. They started coming back as "questionable color". This is not only unfair, but it suggests that the people responsible for assigning grades to quite valuable coins have no idea what they are doing.
'35-S is known for having a richer and darker luster than it's philly counterpart. It's the nature of that mint and year, anyone who has handled a fair amount of Lincolns knows that each year has it's individual characteristics.
I'm losing more and more faith in the grading companies. It's frustrating that we have to play by their rules, that they are the ultimate decision maker, even though they may not be the experts in many cases.
What're your thoughts?
Here's a perfect example: http://www.teletrade.com/coins/lot.a...=3230&lot=1060
My friend in Oregon is helping his neighbor to disperse his collection and settle his estate. One of the incredible items in the collection is an original bankwrapped roll of 1935-S cents. '35-S is a pretty pricey coin in Gem Red condition. My friend pulled a dozen of the nicest (and they're VERY nice) and submitted them to PCGS. They started coming back as "questionable color". This is not only unfair, but it suggests that the people responsible for assigning grades to quite valuable coins have no idea what they are doing.
'35-S is known for having a richer and darker luster than it's philly counterpart. It's the nature of that mint and year, anyone who has handled a fair amount of Lincolns knows that each year has it's individual characteristics.
I'm losing more and more faith in the grading companies. It's frustrating that we have to play by their rules, that they are the ultimate decision maker, even though they may not be the experts in many cases.
What're your thoughts?
Comment