Struck Through What????

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • papascoins
    Member
    • Mar 2011
    • 1202

    #1

    Error Struck Through | Struck Through What????

    I thought this might be a 'struck through cloth', but I don't really know. It is a Lincoln Cent 1988 Denver, and it has the same appearance on both sides. I know it probably is grease, but I was maybe misinformed when I took the pics. Any advise?
    Attached Files
    Mark
  • liveandievarieties
    TPG & Market Expert
    • Feb 2011
    • 6049

    #2
    The obverse appears to have a similar texture to a coin struck through cloth, but that wouldn't be duplicated on the reverse. The reverse better depicts the many, many contact marks. My perspective says it's a damaged coin, subjected to a parking lot, perhaps put in a paint can and shaken by a mechanical shaker with other coins inside, or any number of other ways beyone what I can imagine. But my call is a confident "post mint damage".
    [B][FONT=Franklin Gothic Medium][SIZE=2]Chris & Charity Welch- [COLOR=red]LIVEAN[/COLOR][COLOR=black]DIE[/COLOR][COLOR=blue]VARIETIES[/COLOR][/SIZE][/FONT][/B]
    [FONT=Franklin Gothic Medium]Purveyors of Modern Treasure [/FONT]

    Comment

    • papascoins
      Member
      • Mar 2011
      • 1202

      #3
      That is an interesting theory. i am going to look closer at that coin now. It does seem though that the rim would have been much more damaged, and the damage isn't a 'flattened ' look, but seems to be 'equally' distributed on every part of the coin.
      I'm going to look now! LOL
      I'll get some more pics too, if wanted.
      Thanks
      Mark

      Comment

      • jallengomez
        Member
        • Jan 2010
        • 4447

        #4
        It's been subject to acid. Whether it was dipped or dug up from the ground.
        “What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence.”

        Comment

        • DoubleYou
          Member
          • Sep 2010
          • 3629

          #5
          Simply put, PSD. Rather difficult to tell exactly which war it fought in.
          Wendell Carper
          It's a bird! It's a plane! Aw nuts... It's merely two die scratches!

          Comment

          • georoxx

            #6
            Agreed. PSD.

            -George

            Comment

            • coinman2009
              Member
              • Jan 2010
              • 1569

              #7
              An 88-D???? Would Have Never Guessed??? That's ONE'S Got A Wild Story To Tell! Most Likely PSD!

              Comment

              • Bri
                Member
                • May 2010
                • 509

                #8
                Originally posted by jallengomez
                It's been subject to acid. Whether it was dipped or dug up from the ground.
                I have to agree with jallengomez. It does have the appearance of acidic erosion. Saw a coin that looked similar to this one in a coin book that had been found in a sewer and it was all ate up like that. I've been known to be wrong before so maybe others will have an idea.
                Bri

                Comment

                • DoubleYou
                  Member
                  • Sep 2010
                  • 3629

                  #9
                  Originally posted by coinman2009
                  An 88-D???? Would Have Never Guessed??? That's ONE'S Got A Wild Story To Tell! Most Likely PSD!
                  Actually, I disagree with the date 1988. The obverse design style is from the 70's, so it is more likely a 1978.
                  Wendell Carper
                  It's a bird! It's a plane! Aw nuts... It's merely two die scratches!

                  Comment

                  • rlm's cents
                    Member
                    • Aug 2011
                    • 453

                    #10
                    There is something wrong here. An 88-D that badly damaged (parking lot or acid) would show a lot of zinc. IMO, there are too many sharp corners to be struck through cloth. How about PMD on a 1968-D cent? It that case, it should weigh 3.1 grams. Has it been weighed?
                    http://boards.collectors-society.com.../40238/sig.jpg

                    Comment

                    • DoubleYou
                      Member
                      • Sep 2010
                      • 3629

                      #11
                      Originally posted by rlm's cents
                      There is something wrong here. An 88-D that badly damaged (parking lot or acid) would show a lot of zinc. IMO, there are too many sharp corners to be struck through cloth. How about PMD on a 1968-D cent? It that case, it should weigh 3.1 grams. Has it been weighed?
                      Good observation now we have two reasons for this not being an 88-D. We seem to be sticking with the last 8 however. I think because the head is slightly thinner and the motto is slightly thinner than an 1968, that it is between ODV-024 and ODV-031 (see http://varietyvista.com/Lincoln%20Ce...%20Changes.htm), which is from 1969-1982, which would make it a 1978-D, if the last digit is indeed an 8.
                      Wendell Carper
                      It's a bird! It's a plane! Aw nuts... It's merely two die scratches!

                      Comment

                      • kloccwork419
                        Banned
                        • Sep 2008
                        • 6800

                        #12
                        damage......PSD for sure

                        Comment

                        • mustbebob
                          Lincoln Cent Variety Expert
                          • Jul 2008
                          • 12758

                          #13
                          Another case of some good diagnostic work folks. You all make me so proud to see the energy and knowledge level continuing to improve. Great work!
                          Bob Piazza
                          Former Lincoln Cent Attributer Coppercoins.com

                          Comment

                          • papascoins
                            Member
                            • Mar 2011
                            • 1202

                            #14
                            No Zinc Here

                            Wow, you guys ARE good. Great observations. I'm sending some more pics of the date for more determination. Any votes for 59D?
                            Thank you. Thank you.
                            Attached Files
                            Mark

                            Comment

                            • DoubleYou
                              Member
                              • Sep 2010
                              • 3629

                              #15
                              Too much damage on the coin to tell from the pictures any further on the date, I'm afraid.
                              Wendell Carper
                              It's a bird! It's a plane! Aw nuts... It's merely two die scratches!

                              Comment

                              Working...