is this posible date over a mintmark?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • rickybailey50
    Member
    • Nov 2012
    • 165

    #1

    Error Other | is this posible date over a mintmark?

    dodnt laugh but what is this under the 4 in date
    Attached Files
  • simonm
    Member
    • Sep 2010
    • 6398

    #2
    It looks like a little bit of displaced metal or some sort of damage. Clearer pics would help, though.
    Last edited by simonm; 11-23-2012, 08:44 PM.
    My old coin album.

    Comment

    • rickybailey50
      Member
      • Nov 2012
      • 165

      #3
      well it sounded kinda strange but wasnt shore what to call it is this possable? on the wheatscent i cant recall readin about anthink like that but there are new discovery every day havent been up on the cents new verites much this year read a lot of you threads on the 64 you post great pices

      Comment

      • LincolnLawyer
        Member
        • Sep 2012
        • 186

        #4
        Can you put up a couple of clear shots?

        Comment

        • rickybailey50
          Member
          • Nov 2012
          • 165

          #5
          yes give me a couple mints see what i can do

          Comment

          • seal006
            Member
            • Jun 2010
            • 2330

            #6
            The mint marks were placed on the working dies. The working dies already had the date on them from the master dies. I do not see how it would even be possible to have a date over the mint mark.
            "If Free Speech stops when someone gets offended, it is not really Free Speech."

            Comment

            • rickybailey50
              Member
              • Nov 2012
              • 165

              #7
              THANK YOU that was what i thought this is a meatle shaving or somthing because i took a cataus needle to remove a pice of crud by the 4 and the lower pice came off the inside one is solaid pretty sure not a mm the pic i took looked like the others .should have poked it with a stick befor i posted i will next time thanks guys and everone

              Comment

              • rickybailey50
                Member
                • Nov 2012
                • 165

                #8
                i hahe posted a lot of pics of driferant vams at vamworld and they use them for their vams that arenr very good BUT THESE CENTS ARE REALLY HARD TO GET A GOOD PIC OF FOR SOME REASON GOT TO WORK ON THAT

                Comment

                • flyhi3
                  Member
                  • Mar 2012
                  • 3702

                  #9
                  There were coins, such as the 1959 D&D punched into the date, so I don't see why it couldn't be. But, I doubt that it is.
                  Alexander Helzel
                  Ecrater eBay Facebook

                  Comment

                  • seal006
                    Member
                    • Jun 2010
                    • 2330

                    #10
                    Originally posted by flyhi3
                    There were coins, such as the 1959 D&D punched into the date, so I don't see why it couldn't be. But, I doubt that it is.
                    Alex, a good number of experts disagree with that 1959-D. Please explain how it could happen. If the D was already on the planchet, it would have been obliterated once the coin was struck with the obverse die, as the field around the date would have been the highest point on that die.
                    "If Free Speech stops when someone gets offended, it is not really Free Speech."

                    Comment

                    • flyhi3
                      Member
                      • Mar 2012
                      • 3702

                      #11
                      Thanks for the info Sean, didn't realize that... True, but they punch the mintmark in.. perhaps it was done "accidently on purpose" and the mintmark was punched in extra hard (on the 1959) but I know it is unlikely, and I doubt that was the case. I can see why the experts disagree with it, and I am pretty neutral.
                      Alexander Helzel
                      Ecrater eBay Facebook

                      Comment

                      • mustbebob
                        Lincoln Cent Variety Expert
                        • Jul 2008
                        • 12758

                        #12
                        From the very beginning, I was going to just pass by this post, but the fact that it took two pages of replies made me change my mind.
                        Do we really need to stretch for possible explanations on some of these? There is basically no way a date could be punched over a mint mark. If you don't understand the minting process, you need to read up on it before you even suggest some of these outlandish possibilities. I have been seeing more and more of this type of guessing going on in the forum. Please folks...before you post possible finds here, at least do some research and ask yourself if it is even possible that some of these things could happen.

                        I am not discouraging asking the question, but even newbies should be educating themselves...especially on the process of making coins.
                        Bob Piazza
                        Former Lincoln Cent Attributer Coppercoins.com

                        Comment

                        • rickybailey50
                          Member
                          • Nov 2012
                          • 165

                          #13
                          mustbebob im sorry about the wording in the post but i didnt seem to find the right word forwhat i wantto ask adout the date as soon as i posted and looked at it i relized it didnt come out right

                          Comment

                          • seal006
                            Member
                            • Jun 2010
                            • 2330

                            #14
                            Originally posted by mustbebob
                            From the very beginning, I was going to just pass by this post, but the fact that it took two pages of replies made me change my mind.
                            Do we really need to stretch for possible explanations on some of these? There is basically no way a date could be punched over a mint mark. If you don't understand the minting process, you need to read up on it before you even suggest some of these outlandish possibilities. I have been seeing more and more of this type of guessing going on in the forum. Please folks...before you post possible finds here, at least do some research and ask yourself if it is even possible that some of these things could happen.

                            I am not discouraging asking the question, but even newbies should be educating themselves...especially on the process of making coins.
                            Do I win??
                            "If Free Speech stops when someone gets offended, it is not really Free Speech."

                            Comment

                            Working...