Clashed Through Foreign Object?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • jallengomez
    Member
    • Jan 2010
    • 4447

    #1

    Error Other | Clashed Through Foreign Object?

    I came across this one last night. When I looked at the obverse, I first thought it was a clash and then realized it didn't correspond to any design elements. I then flipped it over and saw the exact same thing on the corresponding area of the reverse. My thoughts are that the dies came together while a foreign object was in the chamber. Something hard enough to leave an imprint on the dies. Sound about right? Illuminati? The Russians? I realize this is mostly academic and adds no value, but my mind has to figure out these little anomalies. The area in question is raised. I ended up pulling a few coins from this die pair out of the roll.



    “What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence.”
  • kloccwork419
    Banned
    • Sep 2008
    • 6800

    #2
    Cool find whatever it is.

    Comment

    • Maineman750
      Administrator

      • Apr 2011
      • 12079

      #3
      Looks like a copper worn to me Jody ...but I'm waiting to hear from one of the error experts.
      https://www.ebay.com/sch/maineman750...75.m3561.l2562

      Comment

      • jallengomez
        Member
        • Jan 2010
        • 4447

        #4
        I like the worm theory, so I'm glad I didn't follow my inclinations and bite into it.

        I also posted this on the Errorcoininformationexchange yahoo group, and Mike Diamond said he was familiar with the die pair and that it was indeed a foreign object that was present when the die pairs came together in the absence of a planchet.
        “What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence.”

        Comment

        • kloccwork419
          Banned
          • Sep 2008
          • 6800

          #5
          Cool so its a known error. What year is this?

          Comment

          • jallengomez
            Member
            • Jan 2010
            • 4447

            #6
            Sorry, forgot to mention that. It's a 1959-D.
            “What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence.”

            Comment

            • kloccwork419
              Banned
              • Sep 2008
              • 6800

              #7
              Time to search some BU rolls..lol. Neat piece

              Comment

              Working...