2 possible mad die clashes.

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Jacob
    Member
    • Jun 2012
    • 1737

    #1

    Error Die Clash/Break | 2 possible mad die clashes.

    Heres 2 different possible mad die clashes. The secon pic is the second one I found from 1985 same spot and all. The first pic is 1995.
    Attached Files
    Life is not about greatness but on the impact of good onto others. It is a matter of how much one shines. Explains why I like shiny coins.
  • jay4202472000
    Member
    • Dec 2012
    • 1346

    #2
    First pic question:

    Does the area above IN rise to meet the rim, or is it slightly lower than normal? I can't tell because of the shadow. If it rises, like a hill, to the rim, it could be die attrition. I found a 1982 that looks very similar. Here is the link:

    Comment

    • jallengomez
      Member
      • Jan 2010
      • 4447

      #3
      The first one looks like peripheral die damage of some sort. The second one looks interesting.
      “What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence.”

      Comment

      • mikediamond
        Paid Member, Error Expert

        • Jan 2008
        • 1104

        #4
        The specimen on the left has a die attrition error. The specimen on the right seems to show a shallow groove. That would be inconsistent with a tilted and radically misaligned die clash; it could very well be a contact mark from another coin.

        Comment

        • jcuve
          Moderator, Die & Variety Expert
          • Apr 2008
          • 15458

          #5
          I agree, peripheral die damage, maybe attrition. The second I'm not sure. It's incuse and this is the second you found? To be classified as MAD clash something needs to be tied into the design - right now I am not seeing that.

          EDIT: Mike replied as I slowly typed...



          Jason Cuvelier


          MadDieClashes.com - ErrorVariety.com
          TrailDies.com - Error-ref.com - Port.Cuvelier.org
          CONECA

          (images © Jason Cuvelier 2008-18)___________________

          Comment

          • Jacob
            Member
            • Jun 2012
            • 1737

            #6
            Originally posted by jcuve
            I agree, peripheral die damage, maybe attrition. The second I'm not sure. It's incuse and this is the second you found? To be classified as MAD clash something needs to be tied into the design - right now I am not seeing that.

            EDIT: Mike replied as I slowly typed...
            Ill send them both to you when things calm down a bit here.
            Life is not about greatness but on the impact of good onto others. It is a matter of how much one shines. Explains why I like shiny coins.

            Comment

            • Jacob
              Member
              • Jun 2012
              • 1737

              #7
              July 2nd 2013 I posted the other 1985 coin. Cant figure out how to bring up old threads.
              Life is not about greatness but on the impact of good onto others. It is a matter of how much one shines. Explains why I like shiny coins.

              Comment

              Working...