You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features.
For more information on registration and an upgrade to Paid and Premium Memberships go to our Membership page and join our community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Hello jbul! Yes, my son and I watched the eclipse through a welding helmet, pretty cool! Does your coin stick to a magnet? I'm thinking it's a greaser, but not sure.
The reverse does look like it was struck through a filled die, and a nice example of it. However, the obverse looks like extreme wear, but there could be a combination. Nice coin. Welcome to the forum.
All opinions expressed are not necessarily shared by willbrooks or his affiliates. Taking them may result in serious side effects. Results may vary. Offer not valid in New Jersey.
Interesting, it looks like a greaser.
I'd think that the wear shouldn't reduce the weight that much and a greaser shouldn't reduce it at all.
Wear always looks like it reduces weight more than it really does because it starts taking off the rims and details while most of the body weight remains. Even really thin slick looking 90% silver looks like it's half gone but they weigh 80-90% of normal.
Most of what's missing on that cent looks missing from grease or strike more than wear.
Really not sure but maybe the planchet started out underweight.
Is the coin of consistent thickness throughout? That is, is this struck on a tapered planchet? If it is not tapered, I'm with Ed that it's struck through.
The coin appears to exhibit a slight taper, best as I can tell (no expert here). I compared the thickness to another wheatie, and found that the 1935 looks to be about 1/2 mm thinner overall. I am leaning more toward struck through also.
Comment