1935 Lincoln Cent

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • jbul
    Member
    • Jul 2015
    • 39

    #1

    1935 Lincoln Cent

    Hi all, I hope everyone got to see the eclipse today. I have a 1935 Lincoln cent that weighs only 2.628 grams and is struck through, I think.

    Will appreciate any input. Thanks!
    Attached Files
  • makecents
    Paid Member

    • Jun 2017
    • 11038

    #2
    Could there be enough wear to account for the weight?

    Comment

    • VAB2013
      Forum Ambassador
      • Nov 2013
      • 12351

      #3
      Hello jbul! Yes, my son and I watched the eclipse through a welding helmet, pretty cool! Does your coin stick to a magnet? I'm thinking it's a greaser, but not sure.

      Comment

      • jbul
        Member
        • Jul 2015
        • 39

        #4
        Hello VAB2013. The coin is not magnetic.

        Comment

        • willbrooks
          Die & Design Expert, LCF Glossary Author

          • Jan 2012
          • 9477

          #5
          The reverse does look like it was struck through a filled die, and a nice example of it. However, the obverse looks like extreme wear, but there could be a combination. Nice coin. Welcome to the forum.
          All opinions expressed are not necessarily shared by willbrooks or his affiliates. Taking them may result in serious side effects. Results may vary. Offer not valid in New Jersey.

          Comment

          • GrumpyEd
            Member
            • Jan 2013
            • 7229

            #6
            Interesting, it looks like a greaser.
            I'd think that the wear shouldn't reduce the weight that much and a greaser shouldn't reduce it at all.
            Wear always looks like it reduces weight more than it really does because it starts taking off the rims and details while most of the body weight remains. Even really thin slick looking 90% silver looks like it's half gone but they weigh 80-90% of normal.

            Most of what's missing on that cent looks missing from grease or strike more than wear.

            Really not sure but maybe the planchet started out underweight.

            Comment

            • Roller
              Member
              • Feb 2010
              • 6975

              #7
              Is the coin of consistent thickness throughout? That is, is this struck on a tapered planchet? If it is not tapered, I'm with Ed that it's struck through.

              Comment

              • jbul
                Member
                • Jul 2015
                • 39

                #8
                The coin appears to exhibit a slight taper, best as I can tell (no expert here). I compared the thickness to another wheatie, and found that the 1935 looks to be about 1/2 mm thinner overall. I am leaning more toward struck through also.

                Comment

                • jfines69
                  Member
                  • Jun 2010
                  • 28848

                  #9
                  Sounds like a thin planchet and looks like a struck thru with some circ wear... Nice find!!!
                  Jim
                  (A.K.A. Elmer Fudd) Be verwy verwy quiet... I'm hunting coins!!! Good Hunting!!!

                  Comment

                  • uglycent
                    Member
                    • Mar 2009
                    • 1386

                    #10
                    I agree with the thin plachet, and with and grease if lightness from the thinness causing the missing details.
                    Even a fool can look wise if he keeps his mouth closed.

                    Comment

                    Working...